Clinical decision-making in melanoma is evolving, as a result of new scientific and clinical trial evidence, and expert scientific discussion. Several guidelines and algorithms for BRAF testing have recently been published, to reflect these evaluations:
There are three points in the patient pathway when testing can be initiated:
When BRAF testing can be triggered | Which patients? | Who requests the test? |
1. Initial diagnosis of melanoma | All melanoma patients5 | Pathologist (reflex testing)5 |
2. After initial MDT meeting in the adjuvant setting | Patients with high-risk resected melanoma (stage IIC, stage IIIB-IIIC)2 | Member of the MDT or pathologist in a ‘reflex manner’ following the initial classification of high-risk disease stage5 |
3. Advanced melanoma | Patients with advanced disease (unresectable stage III or stage IV)2 | Clinician (newly acquired sample from metastasis or on primary tumour sample retrieved from archive)2,5 |
MDT, multidisciplinary team
Reflex testing (option 1 and 2), when the pathologist is directly responsible for requesting the molecular analysis, permits rapid turnaround times, and prevents the need for retrieval of tissue samples at a later date, reducing staff time and therefore cost.5
It is important to note that these guidelines suggest BRAF mutation testing should be carried out in high risk patients or those with metastatic disease.1–3
The ESMO guidelines and NCCN Guidelines® have specific recommendations that are outlined below.1,2
This needs to be balanced against unnecessary testing in patients who will, in all likelihood, not need further treatment, or who may need treatment at a later date, when testing for mutations in alternative genes could be required.5